Beckbury CE Primary School

Travel Plan

 

 

 

 


Introduction

 

This School Travel Plan document sets out a package of measures to reduce the number of car trips made to and from school, to promote healthier and more environmentally friendly forms of transport and to improve safety on the school journey.

 

Why have a School Travel Plan?

 

The need for travel plans has arisen due to growing concerns over:

 

In 1985 15% of school journeys by children aged 5 to 16 were by car. By 2003 this had doubled to 30%. 18% of cars on the road at 8.50am in urban areas are on the school run.

 

Some 25% of children are now overweight or obese compared to 4% in 1972. This is partly due to a decline in physical activity with reduced levels of walking and cycling an important factor. 20% of boys and girls take less than 30 minutes activity a day, half that recommended for a healthy lifestyle.

 

The Government through its ‘Travelling to School Initiative’ wants to see all schools with a travel plan by the end of the decade.

 

“We want to bring a step change in home to school travel patterns to cut congestion and pollution, but also to allow many more pupils to take regular exercise.”

 

(Travelling to School: An action plan DfT/DfES September 2003).

 

This school travel plan sets out how our school community intends to play its part in reducing unnecessary car travel for the school journey and promote more sustainable and healthy travel.

 

The school is registered as an Eco-School and this plan will contribute much to the transport issue within that scheme; is part of the Healthy Schools project and will be registering for Safer Schools this spring term.

 

 

 


General description of the School

Beckbury CE (Controlled) Primary School

Shifnal

Shropshire

TF11 9DQ

 

DfES No. 893/3010

 

Beckbury Primary School is situated just within Shropshire’s eastern boundary, south east of Telford and south-west of Albrighton. The village of Beckbury is at the junction of 4 minor roads and the school is at the eastern extremity of the village. It caters for children aged from 4-11 years.

 

The site map shows its position on the corner, next to the Village field. The main road through the village has footpaths most of the time, but there are gaps and sometimes the path resumes on the opposite side of the road. However, there is little through traffic, so roads are relatively quiet.

 

The original school buildings now just house the caretaker, and the school hall, whilst the classrooms are in demountable buildings behind it. Access is either from the front via a pedestrian gate onto the playground, or from the village car park via a gate and tarmaced footpath through the school garden to the playground.


The school day is from 9am until 3.15pm, although children can come into school from 8.50am. Staff are on duty at these times and children are met by parents in the playground. There are seating areas in the garden which are used by waiting parents.

 

There are 5 full-time members of staff (2 teachers, 2 teaching assistants and an administrator) and 7 part-time (2 teachers, 2 TAs, 2 lunchtime staff and a caretaker/cleaner. Most have to drive to school and parking is available in the adjacent village car par, built recently with much support from school parents.

There are 20 spaces in this car park, which is used by both staff and parents.

 

The front entrance to school does have vehicle access to the caretaker’s house, though this is rarely used at school times. For large or bulky deliveries, these gates can be opened and a lorry brought close to the school, but most deliveries just come via the car
park.

 

There are no cycle stands, but the narrow area behind the school and within the fence is used for storing bikes and scooters.

 

The school is served by a special bus service, which this year only brings 5 children, so a people carrier is the vehicle used. There is a designated and labelled space for this vehicle outside the main front entrance. Scheduled bus services from Telford to Bridgnorth do come through the village, but are very infrequent. A pupil with special needs who spends half of each day in school is brought by taxi, which uses the car park.

 

After-school sports clubs occur on 2 nights each week, so the picking up of children is staggered on those occasions.

 

Other users of the site

There is a pre-school on the site, using another demountable building. This operates in the mornings and caters for around 12 children. Some of these will be siblings of school pupils and parents use the same entrances from the road, or from the car park.

 

In the summer term key stage 2 children go to Bridgnorth for swimming lessons. Coach transport is used for this and children are picked up at the front entrance. For inter-school sports events, parents provide transport in their cars. Children do occasionally walk up through the village to services in the church.

 

Issues raised by the site assessment

The school site itself is very safe, as no vehicles access it during school time, and there is a very safe path from the car park. However, the car park can get overcrowded, and there is danger from cars manoeuvring within it whilst children are walking across it. At busy times cars are double-parked.

 

Current initiatives

 

 

How pupils usually travel to and from school – our baseline

 

Autumn 2005

Pupil’s travel mode

to school

 

from school

 

walk

10

10

cycle

1

1

car

12

12

car  share with siblings

14

14

car share with other pupils

5

5

bus

5

5

taxi

1

1

TOTAL

48

48

 

Trends from previous years are shown below;

 

 

Walk

Cycle

Total Walk and cycle

Car

alone

Car share

with other pupils

Total Car

Bus/

Taxi

2000

32.6%

0

32.6%

11.6%

27.9%

39.5%

27.9%

2002

23.8%

0

23.8%

14.3%

52.4%

66.7%

9.5%

2004

26.7%

0

26.7%

25.6%

28.9%

54.5%

17.8%

2005

20.8%

2.1%

22.9%

25%

39.6%

64.6%

12.5%

 

This year has seen a large rise in car use, and subsequent decline in walking. Bus use has fallen again sharply.

 

Detailed Survey Findings

46 pupils took part in a detailed survey concerning their journey to school with the following results:
 

The vast majority of pupils currently travel to school by car, but the graph shows that the overwhelming preference is for travel by bike. This will not be feasible for many children, but may be possible for some families. Certainly if the number of cars on the roads around the village was reduced, it would be a much safer environment for cyclists.

Pupils often prefer a more active way of getting to school, rather that individual car journeys, and this is reflected in the reasons they give for their preferred choices.

 

It keeps me healthy

31

It's fun

22

I can meet my friends

12

 

Many pupils do car share, with 33% sharing with two or more other pupils. Only 21% of this sample came alone in the car to school.

 

73% of the journeys to school are of less than 10 minutes duration, so there may be scope fro switching from car use amongst this cohort. Only 2 pupils said that they felt unsafe on their journey to school.

 

There was quite a positive response to the idea of cycle training, with 61% saying they would like to participate in this.

 

Items identified that would make walking to school better were:

 

 

 

Safer places to cross the road

11

Wider pavements

9

School lockers to put things in

9

More children to walk with

8

 

Cycling to school would be easier if the following items were in place:

More children to cycle with

12

An entrance away from cars

10

School lockers to put belongings in

9

More cycle lanes and paths

9

 

The full list of children’s comments is in the Appendix. Some recurring themes are highlighted here:

 

What do you like about your journey to school?

 

8 comments were about enjoying the sights and sounds around – “Open countryside, sweet smell of the morning air”

5 mentioned the social side of walking to school – “I like walking to school because I can talk to friends, see things and stay healthy”.

The car riders enjoy listening to music and keeping dry.

 

What do you dislike about your journey?

 

A number commented on their boredom!

Others mentioned sibling arguments in the car, and “the coldness of the car on cold and frosty mornings”

Dog mess on the pavements was also identified.

3 referred to possible danger, but did not specify from what.

 

Safety messages for parents and carers when they drive to school

“Don’t drive too fast”

8

“Be careful about children crossing the road”

7

“Always wear your seat belt”

4

 

What would make the journey to school better for you?

To be able to ride my bike to school – 4

To meet up with my friends – 3

If the lanes weren’t so dangerous/wider paths -2

 

“A bit more adventure and a bit more excitement.”

 

 

27 parent surveys were returned representing 32 pupils, a 64% sample. There was a range of walkers, and car and bus users amongst them.

 

63% of those who travel by car said they would be willing to give a lift to other pupils at the school. Only 35% of the drivers said that they went on to work directly after school, so they may be scope for people to walk on some occasions.

 

Suggestions for improvements within the school grounds included a secure cycle shed (5) and an all-weather shelter (2). A dedicated cycle path was another suggestion.

 

There was some positive response to the idea of a Walking Bus in the village, with 7 parents indicating that they might be willing to help with such an initiative, and 14 saying that they might be willing to let their children participate in it. This would be worth investigating further.

 

More that 92% of the parents said they would like their child to take part in cycle training, and 9 indicated that they might sometimes be able to cycle to school with their children. This would be worth pursuing, and possibly launching in a “Bike to School Week”.

 

Particular areas causing concern on the route to school

No particular locations are mentioned, but there are common problems on the routes to the school

 

The only (serious) idea to encourage sustainable and healthy travel was to have a walking bus from Beckbury Square to the school.

 

Main School Travel and Transport Issues

The main issues that emerged from the surveys and from discussion within the School Travel Plan Group are as follows:

The large rise in the percentage of pupils coming to school by car made easy by the large village car park adjacent to the school

The dispersed nature of the school pupils as seen on the postcode map

The consistent fall in bus numbers

The interest of the pupils in active forms of travel, particularly cycling

Their positive comments about enjoying the world around them and the social side of coming to school with friends.

 

 

The Action Plan

 

 

Parents who had expressed an interest in discussing these issues met together on 18th January 2006 with the Headteacher and School Travel Plan Adviser to discuss some ways of addressing the issues.

 

The School Travel Plan Working Group consists of:

Jonathan Brough – Headteacher

Parents:

Olga Ward

Julie Pleydell

Julie Want

Sarah Place – Teaching Assistant

Lisa Correa  - Teaching Assistant

Julie Potter – SCC School Travel Plan Adviser

 

 

 

The suggested initiatives and targets are shown in the table below.


Objective 1: To encourage walking to school

Target 1: To increase the % walking to school from 21% in 2005 to 23% in 2006

 

 

Actions

Lead person/group

Target date

Monitoring and evaluation

Comments e.g. progress, resource implications

1

To use Walk to School Weeks as a focus for several walking initiatives:

  • Crazy ways of getting to school
  • Whole school walk from Seven Stars Pub on one day
  • Use International Walk to School Week for measuring distances and linking with a map of Shrops/UK/World

 

 

 

 

JB

 

JB

 

SP/Lisa

 

 

 

May 2006/7

 

May 2006/7

 

October 2006

 

Resources provided by SCC

 

 

 

 

Permission needed from landlord, and from Integrated Transport Unit for bus users

 

 

2

To investigate the setting up of a Walking Bus from the Seven Stars, and with a bus stop at the Square.

 

Julie Pleydell /Olga Ward

Spring Term 2006

 

Caroline House to be contacted to do Risk Assessment of route.

CRB checks via school.

3

To set up a pedometer challenge amongst groups of pupils

 

Julie Want/JB

Summer Term 2006

 

Julie P can get cheap supplies of pedometers

4

To research whether “Severn Strollers” might be able to organise walks in the school locality

Julie Want

Summer Term 2006

 

 

5

Longer term monitoring of safety of walking routes

JB

Spring Term 2007

 

Possible liaison with SCC

 

 

 

Objective 2: To promote cycling

 

Target 2:To increase the % cycling to school from 2.1% to 4%

 

 

 

Actions

Lead person/role

Target date

Monitoring and evaluation

Comments e.g. progress, resource implications

1

Arrange Cycle Awareness Training for year 5 and 6 pupils

 

JB

Summer Term 2006

 

SCC Road Safety Team

2

To have a “Wheely Good Day” during Bike Week when children can bring bikes/scooters to use on the playground

 

JB/Lisa/Sarah

June 19-23rd 2006

 

Possible sponsored circuits of playground?

Or link to curriculum work

3

To organise a Family Cycle Ride with the BSA (school association), possibly incorporating a Treasure Hunt, or a barbeque

 

Julie Pleydell + PTA

June 2006

 

 

4

To research different designs and costs of cycle storage

 

JB + School Council

Summer Term 2006

 

JP to provide egs of suppliers

 

 

Objective 3: To encourage sensible and safe car use

 

Target 3: To reduce the % coming to school by car from 65% in 2005 to 60% in 2006

 

 

 

Actions

Lead person/role

Target date

Monitoring and evaluation

Comments e.g. progress, resource implications

1

To promote safe car behaviour in the school car park, via prospectus and newsletters

 

JB

June 2006

 

 

2

To promote car sharing amongst parents who live near each other – use postcode maps to identify clusters

 

Olga Ward

Summer Term 2006

 

 

3

To encourage car users coming from the west and north to “Park and Stride” and use the Walking Bus for part of the journey

 

STP group via newsletter

 

JB via prospectus/induction

Summer Term 2006

 

 

4

To make parents aware of bus provision to the school and encourage full use of facility

 

JB

On application to school

 

 

 

 

Objective 4: To improve the involvement of children in road safety and sustainable travel education

 

 

Actions

Lead person/role

Target date

Monitoring and evaluation

Comments e.g. progress, resource implications

1

To involve the School Council in taking photos and designing the cover for the Travel Plan, and in producing a School Travel display

 

JB

Spring Term 2006

 

A2 laminated maps provided

2

To include Road Safety education within PSHE on a regular basis

 

JB

Summer Term 2006 and 2007

 

Caroline House – Road Safety Officer could be invited in

3

Geography curriculum involves study of the local area – routes to school involved in this

 

JB/Lisa/Sarah

Autumn Term 2006

 

JP to provide set of village maps

4

Incorporate walks at relevant points within the curriculum – eg Sound Walk, Bluebell Walk, land-use mapping exercise

 

JB

Throughout year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Objective 5 ; To establish systems within the school which support and monitor the Travel Plan

 

 

Actions

Lead person/role

Target date

Monitoring and evaluation

Comments e.g. progress, resource implications

1

Participate in the Annual County School Travel Survey

JB

School Council could administer this and relate results back to pupils

November 2006

 

SCC send out relevant forms

 

 

2

Update the School Prospectus with details about the Travel Plan and various initiatives

JB

June 2005

 

 

3

Monitor and review the School Travel Plan

STP group + Governors

March 2007

 

 


SUMMARY OF TARGETS FROM TRAVEL PLAN

 

Spring Term 2006

1. Investigate Walking Bus – get route risk assessed + CRB checks for volunteers

2. Involve School Council in designs, photos, etc.

 

JP/OW

 

JB

Summer Term 2006

1. Walk to School Week activities

2. Pedometer Challenge

3. Contact Severn Strollers re. local walks

4. Cycle Awareness Training

 

5. Wheely Day

6. Family Cycle Ride

7. Research cycle storage

8. Prospectus update

9. Promotion of car share/Walking Bus

10. Road Safety Education in PSHE

 

JB/SP/LC

JW/JB

JB

JB/Road Safety Unit

 

JB/LC/SP

JP/PTA

JB/School Council

JB

STO group

JB

Autumn Term 2006

1. International Walk to School Week – curriculum links

2. Annual County Travel Survey

3. Mapwork in Geography curriculum

 

JB

 

JB + School Council

JB

Spring Term

2007

 

1. Monitor safety of walking routes

2.  Monitor and review School Travel Plan

JB

STP group + Governors

2007- 8

Continued curriculum developments 

Further initiatives from revised STP

 

 

 

Ideas for use of School Travel Plan Grants

A covered cycle storage area is the main suggestion.

Some sort of shelter for parents or pupils would also be popular

 

Consultation and Stakeholders

October 2005

Meeting between Jonathan Brough and Julie Potter to do site assessment and discuss Travel Plan process

October 2005

Parents’ survey completed -64% sample

October 2005

Pupil’s detailed survey completed – 46/48 pupils participated

November 2005

Annual county survey completed by all pupils

January 2006

First meeting of STP group, with head teacher, and 5 parents, 2 of whom are Teaching Assistants, and 3 of whom are involved in the PTA, plus SCC Travel Plan Adviser

February 2006

Caroline House to do Risk Assessment of Walking Bus route with interested parents

 

The Governing Body has been made of aware of the development of the Travel Plan by the Headteacher, as has the Pre-School which meets on the school site.

 

 

 

 

Monitoring and Review of Our School Travel Plan

 

We recognise that this plan is a start and we need to monitor and review our objectives and planned initiatives. We therefore aim to:

 

 

Our first annual review will take place in March 2007 and will involve the STP group who will report to the Governors.

 

This agreement is an expression of commitment and goodwill on the part of the stakeholders to achieve a positive outcome for the pupils and the local community.

             

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date.........

Headteacher

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date..........

Chair of Governors

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date.........

School Travel Plan Working Group

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date.........

School Travel Plan Adviser, Shropshire County Council

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date..........

Pre-School leader

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date..........

School Council Member

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date.........

Assistant Director, Children and Young Peoples’ Services Shropshire County Council

 

Signed...............................................................................................Date..........

Assistant Director, Economy and Environment, Shropshire County Council